Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0WY5DVYGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 9, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al.

S.D. Fla. · Sep 2, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
S.D. Fla.
Record ID
sea-swivel-inc-v-shuttleslide-llc-et-al-2026-09-02
Observed outcome
Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Misrepresented: Case Law | The response asserted that Affordable Aerial Photography established that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court explained that the cited decision expressly declined to decide whether a renewed 21-day period applied and therefore did not support that proposition. Outcome: Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.. Shuttleslide’s response, titled “CoCounsel Skill Results” and bearing CoCounsel metadata, relied on Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Abdelsayed for the proposition that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court found that precedent did not decide the timeliness issue and was expressly silent on it, making the response’s assertion that the motion was untimely “pursuant to” that case inaccurate. The Court held the motion timely under Rule 12(f), granted the motion to strike, and cautioned counsel that attorneys remain responsible under Rule 11 for inaccurate AI-assisted work product.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and trial and records Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI. in S.D. Fla.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Trial
  • Struck Filing
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
CoCounsel
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

CoCounsel is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.