Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al.
S.D. Fla. · Sep 2, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | The response asserted that Affordable Aerial Photography established that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court explained that the cited decision expressly declined to decide whether a renewed 21-day period applied and therefore did not support that proposition. Outcome: Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.. Shuttleslide’s response, titled “CoCounsel Skill Results” and bearing CoCounsel metadata, relied on Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Abdelsayed for the proposition that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court found that precedent did not decide the timeliness issue and was expressly silent on it, making the response’s assertion that the motion was untimely “pursuant to” that case inaccurate. The Court held the motion timely under Rule 12(f), granted the motion to strike, and cautioned counsel that attorneys remain responsible under Rule 11 for inaccurate AI-assisted work product.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and trial and records Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI. in S.D. Fla.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | The response asserted that Affordable Aerial Photography established that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court explained that the cited decision expressly declined to decide whether a renewed 21-day period applied and therefore did not support that proposition. Outcome: Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.. Shuttleslide’s response, titled “CoCounsel Skill Results” and bearing CoCounsel metadata, relied on Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Abdelsayed for the proposition that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court found that precedent did not decide the timeliness issue and was expressly silent on it, making the response’s assertion that the motion was untimely “pursuant to” that case inaccurate. The Court held the motion timely under Rule 12(f), granted the motion to strike, and cautioned counsel that attorneys remain responsible under Rule 11 for inaccurate AI-assisted work product.
This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI. in S.D. Fla.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
CoCounsel is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The response asserted that Affordable Aerial Photography established that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court explained that the cited decision expressly declined to decide whether a renewed 21-day period applied and therefore did not support that proposition.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al.?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The response asserted that Affordable Aerial Photography established that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court explained that the cited decision expressly declined to decide whether a renewed 21-day period applied and therefore did not support that proposition. Outcome: Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI.. Shuttleslide’s response, titled “CoCounsel Skill Results” and bearing CoCounsel metadata, relied on Affordable Aerial Photography, Inc. v. Abdelsayed for the proposition that Plaintiff’s motion to strike was untimely. The Court found that precedent did not decide the timeliness issue and was expressly silent on it, making the response’s assertion that the motion was untimely “pursuant to” that case inaccurate. The Court held the motion timely under Rule 12(f), granted the motion to strike, and cautioned counsel that attorneys remain responsible under Rule 11 for inaccurate AI-assisted work product.
- Why does Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with Motion to strike granted; no AI-related sanction imposed, but counsel was cautioned about Rule 11 obligations when relying on AI. in S.D. Fla.. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Sea Swivel Inc. v. Shuttleslide LLC, et al. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.