Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1HSK93TGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Sebastian Rako v. VMware LLC (2)

N.D. California · Feb 4, 2026

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
N.D. California
Record ID
sebastian-rako-v-vmware-llc-2-2026-02-04
Observed outcome
Required meet-and-confer for AI-use disputes
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff (pro se) previously cited non-existent/fictitious cases in filings; VMware asserted those citations were likely AI-hallucinated and the Court warned against filing such fabricated case citations. Outcome: Required meet-and-confer for AI-use disputes.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff (pro se) previously cited non-existent/fictitious cases in filings; VMware asserted those citations were likely AI-hallucinated and the Court warned against filing such fabricated case citations.

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. California, with the listed outcome: Required meet-and-confer for AI-use disputes.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Contract
  • Trial
  • None Adjudicated
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Required meet-and-confer for AI-use disputes
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.