HomeCasesNajafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

N.D. California · Apr 3, 2026

CA / federalEditorial impact: career endingpro sefake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited multiple non-existent cases in the TAC which the Court concluded were hallucinated by AI and held non-existent cases cannot support his asserted legal propositions. Outcome: Claim dismissed with prejudice.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Claim dismissed with prejudice; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Claim dismissed with prejudice in N.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Claim dismissed with prejudice in N.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 3, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeClaim dismissed with prejudice

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Claim dismissed with prejudice

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited multiple non-existent cases in the TAC which the Court concluded were hallucinated by AI and held non-existent cases cannot support his asserted legal propositions.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited multiple non-existent cases in the TAC which the Court concluded were hallucinated by AI and held non-existent cases cannot support his asserted legal propositions. Outcome: Claim dismissed with prejudice.
Why does Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Claim dismissed with prejudice in N.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Sebastian Rako v. VMware LLC (2)N.D. California · Feb 4, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Pop Top Corp. v. Rakuten KoboN.D. California · Jul 25, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Adrienne Hankins v. Dentons US LLP, et al.N.D. California · Jun 22, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Zhdanovich-Doty v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance CompanyN.D. California · Jun 22, 2026same court · fake citations + contract Saqib Kafeel v. Apple Inc., et al.N.D. California · Apr 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations MacroCharts Research LLC v. Tony ChouN.D. California · Jan 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 3, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeClaim dismissed with prejudice

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Questions this record answers

What happened in Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.?

Why does Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.?

Which source supports this Najafpir v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.