St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.
TAT · Dec 15, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TAT
- Record ID
- st-roch-c-andritz-hydro-canada-inc-2025-12-15
- Observed outcome
- The application for review was dismissed; the original decision upholding the termination of employment stands.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The Tribunal administratif du travail (TAT) rejected an application for review of a dismissal decision. The applicant attempted to support his claims by citing a non-existent case, 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'. The Tribunal clarified that this decision does not exist and was not pleaded in the original proceeding, and subsequently found no fundamental error in the original ruling.
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Decision on a request for review or revocation of a prior administrative tribunal decision (TAT-1) regarding employment termination.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The source does not name a tool, but the nature of the error implies AI usage.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.