HomeCasesSt-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.

TAT · Dec 15, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Record details

CourtTAT

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 15, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.

Questions this record answers

What happened in St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.
Why does St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
What does the public record establish about St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Bégin-Létourneau c. Syndicat des spécialistes et professionnels d'Hydro-QuébecTAT · Dec 15, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations John Hurt v. Ampcus, Inc.E.D. Texas · Jul 8, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Adrienne Hankins v. Dentons US LLP, et al.N.D. California · Jun 22, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Preston House v. TH Foods, Inc.D. Nevada · Jun 18, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Campbell v Reset Society of CalgaryHRT Alberta · Jun 16, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Conrado Poblete v Ontario Public Service Employees UnionON LRB · Jun 11, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

Questions this record answers

What happened in St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited 'Bélanger c. Ville de Repentigny, 2008 QCCA 603'; Tribunal states this decision does not exist and was not pleaded before TAT-1.

Why does St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in TAT, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

What does the public record establish about St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc.?

Which source supports this St-Roch c. Andritz Hydro Canada inc. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.