State v. Dixon
CA Oregon · Jul 15, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA Oregon
- Record ID
- state-v-dixon-2026-07-15
- Observed outcome
- The court struck the fabricated citations and imposed a $100 fine.
- Known monetary consequence
- $100
Why this matter warrants attention
The Oregon Court of Appeals struck fabricated citations from a pro se appellant's brief and imposed a $100 fine after the litigant submitted nonexistent and misrepresented case law. The court rejected the defendant's explanation that the errors were unintentional and denied her request to file a corrected brief.
The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Brief contained citations to nonexistent cases; the court struck those fabricated citations..
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a state proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Criminal
- Appellate
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $100
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a criminal conviction where the court addressed procedural deficiencies in the appellant's pro se briefing.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The defendant stated her drafting process produced the fabricated authority.
Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Check the cited authority, reporter reference, and pinpoint against the primary source before filing.
- Correct any unsupported citation promptly and preserve the verification record.
- Treat the listed consequence as case-specific rather than as a general rule about AI use.