HomeCasesKeith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland

CA Oregon · Feb 11, 2026

OR / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authority

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Briefs contained several citations to completely fabricated cases that could not be located in any Oregon law reporter or database; court found them nonexistent and declined to consider them. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Briefs contained several citations to completely fabricated cases that could not be located in any Oregon law reporter or database; court found them nonexistent and declined to consider them. || False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs included multiple purported quotations the court could not find in the cited Oregon cases or elsewhere in Oregon law; quotations were determined to be inaccurate or nonexistent. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Claims cited cases that were unrelated to the propositions for which they were cited, i.e., inaccurately applied or misrepresented precedents.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Oregon, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Oregon, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Record details

OregonSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtCA Oregon

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateFeb 11, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeMonetary Sanction

Known amount$500

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Briefs contained several citations to completely fabricated cases that could not be located in any Oregon law reporter or database; court found them nonexistent and declined to consider them.
False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs included multiple purported quotations the court could not find in the cited Oregon cases or elsewhere in Oregon law; quotations were determined to be inaccurate or nonexistent.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Claims cited cases that were unrelated to the propositions for which they were cited, i.e., inaccurately applied or misrepresented precedents.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland?: Fabricated: Case Law | Briefs contained several citations to completely fabricated cases that could not be located in any Oregon law reporter or database; court found them nonexistent and declined to consider them. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Why does Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Oregon, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
What does the public record establish about Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Carol L. Williams v. Tracy HonlCA Oregon · Apr 22, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of OregonCA Oregon · Apr 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Doiban v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis CommissionCA Oregon · Mar 18, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes State v. DixonCA Oregon · Jul 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Boersma v. DavenportCA Oregon · May 6, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Eliott Williamson v. TransUnion LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc.11th Cir. CA · May 4, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Oregon, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

False Quotes: Case Law | Briefs included multiple purported quotations the court could not find in the cited Oregon cases or elsewhere in Oregon law; quotations were determined to be inaccurate or nonexistent.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Claims cited cases that were unrelated to the propositions for which they were cited, i.e., inaccurately applied or misrepresented precedents.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland?

Why does Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CA Oregon, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.

What does the public record establish about Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland?

Which source supports this Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of Portland summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.