Suki v. State of Israel
CD Lod · Jun 11, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- CD Lod
- Record ID
- suki-v-state-of-israel-2026-06-11
- Observed outcome
- The appeal was dismissed, and counsel was issued a formal warning regarding the use of AI in legal filings.
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪0
Why this matter warrants attention
The court issued a formal warning to counsel for submitting fabricated legal authorities generated by AI. The judge emphasized that counsel's failure to verify AI-generated citations constitutes a breach of professional duties to the court and the legal system, though no personal monetary sanctions were imposed in this specific case.
The linked source identifies the filing problem as: Counsel cited a case by number '195/18' which the court's search could not locate; the citation appears not to exist..
The source records a concrete authority-verification problem in a international proceeding and the tribunal’s documented response to it.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Explicitly Recorded
- Recorded tool
- AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪0
- Procedural posture
- Appellate review of a criminal conviction and plea agreement, during which the court addressed the validity of counsel's legal citations.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court identified the source of the citations as AI.
Limited to the linked source and the documented citation or quotation issue and stated disposition; no unrecorded tool, motive, or broader litigation facts are inferred.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Check the cited authority, reporter reference, and pinpoint against the primary source before filing.
- Correct any unsupported citation promptly and preserve the verification record.
- Treat the listed consequence as case-specific rather than as a general rule about AI use.