FJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department
First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) · Oct 1, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The skeleton argument cited an apparent Upper Tribunal decision that the judge identified as an AI hallucination; the Tribunal did not rely on it and instead considered current policy documents. The appellant’s skeleton argument cited two apparent Upper Tribunal decisions—AA (Afghanistan) CG [2024] UKUT 00123 (IAC) and AS (Afghanistan: risk categories) CG [2023] UKUT 00456 (IAC). The judge stated that these appeared to be AI hallucinations and therefore focused on the Respondent’s current policy documents as the relevant country-information sources. The appeal was dismissed, with no separate professional sanction or monetary penalty imposed for the citations.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The skeleton argument cited an apparent Upper Tribunal decision that the judge identified as an AI hallucination; the Tribunal did not rely on it and instead considered current policy documents. The appellant’s skeleton argument cited two apparent Upper Tribunal decisions—AA (Afghanistan) CG [2024] UKUT 00123 (IAC) and AS (Afghanistan: risk categories) CG [2023] UKUT 00456 (IAC). The judge stated that these appeared to be AI hallucinations and therefore focused on the Respondent’s current policy documents as the relevant country-information sources. The appeal was dismissed, with no separate professional sanction or monetary penalty imposed for the citations.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The skeleton argument cited an apparent Upper Tribunal decision that the judge identified as an AI hallucination; the Tribunal did not rely on it and instead considered current policy documents.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The skeleton argument cited an apparent Upper Tribunal decision that the judge identified as an AI hallucination; the Tribunal did not rely on it and instead considered current policy documents.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in FJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The skeleton argument cited an apparent Upper Tribunal decision that the judge identified as an AI hallucination; the Tribunal did not rely on it and instead considered current policy documents. The appellant’s skeleton argument cited two apparent Upper Tribunal decisions—AA (Afghanistan) CG [2024] UKUT 00123 (IAC) and AS (Afghanistan: risk categories) CG [2023] UKUT 00456 (IAC). The judge stated that these appeared to be AI hallucinations and therefore focused on the Respondent’s current policy documents as the relevant country-information sources. The appeal was dismissed, with no separate professional sanction or monetary penalty imposed for the citations.
- Why does FJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about FJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this FJ v Secretary of State for the Home Department summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.