Supplying Demand, LLC (Matter of)
GAO · Nov 24, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- GAO
- Record ID
- supplying-demand-llc-matter-of-2025-11-24
- Observed outcome
- Protest denied; supplemental allegation dismissed; warning issued regarding the use of non-existent legal authority.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The GAO denied the protest and dismissed an untimely supplemental allegation. Although no formal sanctions were imposed, the GAO issued a warning to the pro se protester regarding the submission of filings containing citations to non-existent legal authority, noting that such conduct may lead to future sanctions.
Fabricated: Case Law
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in GAO, with the listed outcome: Warning.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Bid protest before the GAO; the agency requested dismissal of a supplemental allegation, which the GAO granted as untimely, and the GAO subsequently denied the protest on the merits.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The source does not name a tool, only the behavior of citing non-existent authority.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.