Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesThe JAAW Group, LLC
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

The JAAW Group, LLC

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits David Timm; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

GAO · Jul 31, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester cited 'Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001)' for solicitation ambiguity, but that case addresses contractor responsibility and was irrelevant to the argument; protester withdrew the citation. Outcome: Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10).

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10) in GAO. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester cited 'Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001)' for solicitation ambiguity, but that case addresses contractor responsibility and was irrelevant to the argument; protester withdrew the citation. Outcome: Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10).

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10) in GAO. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtGAO
Jurisdictionfederal
CircuitNot recorded
DateJul 31, 2026
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10)
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo

Corrected 2026-11-02: see the corrections log.

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10)

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester cited 'Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001)' for solicitation ambiguity, but that case addresses contractor responsibility and was irrelevant to the argument; protester withdrew the citation.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Protester cited 'Tyco Electronics Corp., B-411937, Nov. 9, 2015' which GAO and the agency were unable to locate; protester later withdrew the citation and acknowledged it did not correspond to a published GAO decision.

Questions this record answers

What happened in The JAAW Group, LLC?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Protester cited 'Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001)' for solicitation ambiguity, but that case addresses contractor responsibility and was irrelevant to the argument; protester withdrew the citation. Outcome: Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10).
Why does The JAAW Group, LLC matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: GAO declined to sanction one non-existent and one wholly irrelevant citation and advised the protester that future filings with such citations may result in sanctions (B-424433.22, p. 10) in GAO. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about The JAAW Group, LLC?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this The JAAW Group, LLC summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow