TA Orléans, Reconduite à la frontière, n° 2506907
TA Orléans · Jan 7, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TA Orléans
- Record ID
- ta-orléans-reconduite-à-la-frontière-n-2506907-2026-01-07
- Observed outcome
- The court partially annulled the administrative orders regarding departure delays and house arrest, while formally admonishing counsel for the use of fabricated legal citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court admonished counsel for submitting multiple non-existent legal citations in their pleadings. The judge explicitly identified these as potential AI-generated 'hallucinations' and ordered counsel to verify all future references before filing, emphasizing the professional obligation to ensure the authenticity of legal authorities presented to the tribunal.
Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 27 juin 2019, n°420269'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 12 octobre 2012, GISTI et FAPIL, n° 34728'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CE, 9 juin 1978, Lebon, n° 05873'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references. || Fabricated: Case Law | Counsel cited 'CAA Lyon, 18 janvier 2022, n° 20LY01957'; the court found that this decision does not exist and urged verification of references.
French administrative courts now admonish counsel by name for unverified Conseil d'Etat citations; verify every reference pre-filing.
Failure modes and consequences
- Hallucinated_case_law
- Lack_of_verification
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Administrative litigation concerning an obligation to leave French territory and house arrest, resulting in a partial annulment of administrative measures and a formal judicial admonishment of counsel.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court refers to the citations as 'hallucinations' or 'confabulations', implying the use of generative AI.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.