אדיבי נ' איי אי ג'י ישראל חברה לביטוח בע"מ
Tel Aviv District Court · Aug 23, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Tel Aviv District Court
- Record ID
- tel-aviv-district-court-ai-case-2026-08-23
- Observed outcome
- Court found the filings relied on AI-generated fabricated case citations, admonished counsel, and ordered the plaintiff to pay respondent's costs of 20,000 ILS; warned about uncontrolled use of AI and the risk of future personal costs.
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited this purported appellate decision in the response; the court found no record of such a decision and treated it as a fabricated AI-generated citation. Outcome: Court found the filings relied on AI-generated fabricated case citations, admonished counsel, and ordered the plaintiff to pay respondent's costs of 20,000 ILS; warned about uncontrolled use of AI and the risk of future personal costs.. The court determined that the plaintiff's counsel relied on 'AI hallucinations' — citations presented as judicial precedents that do not exist. The judge reviewed the referenced authorities, found no record of the cited decisions, characterized the reliance as misleading and possibly produced by AI, and sanctioned the plaintiff by ordering costs of 20,000 ILS while issuing a formal warning about uncritical use of AI in pleadings.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Court found the filings relied on AI-generated fabricated case citations, admonished counsel, and ordered the plaintiff to pay respondent's costs of 20,000 ILS; warned about uncontrolled use of AI and the risk of future personal costs.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Court found the filings relied on AI-generated fabricated case citations, admonished counsel, and ordered the plaintiff to pay respondent's costs of 20,000 ILS; warned about uncontrolled use of AI and the risk of future personal costs. in Tel Aviv District Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Monetary
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $1
- Procedural posture
- Court found the filings relied on AI-generated fabricated case citations, admonished counsel, and ordered the plaintiff to pay respondent's costs of 20,000 ILS; warned about uncontrolled use of AI and the risk of future personal costs.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.