Tellez v. Proiettii
E.D. California · Aug 4, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- E.D. California
- Record ID
- tellez-v-proiettii-2025-08-04
- Observed outcome
- Warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
In Hunter Tellez v. Proiettii, an E.D. California court dismissed a pro se action without leave to amend. The order found one cited authority appeared fictitious, other authorities were wrongly cited or did not support the argument, and warned that filing a fictitious case citation and summary could warrant Rule 11 sanctions.
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in E.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Warning
law.justia.com
Docket or legal-document mirror. The recorded link is hosted by a legal document repository or mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a legal-document or docket mirror. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Source Unavailable (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.