AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 25, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesKimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

E.D. California · Jul 24, 2026

CA / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authorityotherWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pierce v. Cnty. of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2008) for a statute-of-limitations/continuing-violation proposition; court noted the cited opinion exists but does not discuss the statute-of-limitations or continuing-violation issues relied upon, i.e., a mischaracterization of precedent. Outcome: Admonishment & Warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment & Warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment & Warning in E.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pierce v. Cnty. of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2008) for a statute-of-limitations/continuing-violation proposition; court noted the cited opinion exists but does not discuss the statute-of-limitations or continuing-violation issues relied upon, i.e., a mischaracterization of precedent. Outcome: Admonishment & Warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment & Warning in E.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore CAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtE.D. California
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateJul 24, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdmonishment & Warning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Admonishment & Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pierce v. Cnty. of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2008) for a statute-of-limitations/continuing-violation proposition; court noted the cited opinion exists but does not discuss the statute-of-limitations or continuing-violation issues relied upon, i.e., a mischaracterization of precedent.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Boling v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 105 Cal.App.3d 805 (1980); court found this case does not exist and flagged it as a fabricated citation.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited Loving v. Cnty. of Stanislaus, 33 Cal.App.5th 444 (2019); court found this case does not exist and treated it as fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff relied on Pierce v. Cnty. of Orange, 526 F.3d 1190 (9th Cir. 2008) for a statute-of-limitations/continuing-violation proposition; court noted the cited opinion exists but does not discuss the statute-of-limitations or continuing-violation issues relied upon, i.e., a mischaracterization of precedent. Outcome: Admonishment & Warning.
Why does Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment & Warning in E.D. California. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Kimberly A. Graves v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Tellez v. ProiettiiE.D. California · Aug 4, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsShaw v. City of Portola, et al.E.D. California · Apr 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsThornton v. Amazon.com Services LLCE.D. California · Oct 13, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityWilliams v. Dimaanno et al.E.D. California · Sep 28, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsSanchez v. Synchrony Bank N.A.S.D. California · Oct 1, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsVerduzco v. Con Agra Foods Packaged Foods, LLCE.D. California · Sep 28, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.