The Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard
Rotterdam D. · Aug 27, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Rotterdam D.
- Record ID
- the-boys-of-rockanje-v-dwaard-2025-08-27
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The court noted that the party cited fabricated ECLI numbers " When asked, Dwaard (his lawyer) stated that all this was caused by a problem converting a Word file to PDF. This statement raises questions. The court leaves these questions and the question of whether this violated Article 21 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure unanswered, because, on balance, Dwaard did not benefit from the incorrect representation of the facts in the statement of defense. " (Google Translate)
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Blaming 'Word-to-PDF conversion' for fabricated ECLI numbers fooled no one; own the AI use immediately when challenged.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
cyberlawyer.nl
Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.