AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 10, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesThe Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard
Evidence review: secondary source only. Only case-specific secondary coverage was accessible. It provides context, not independent proof of the underlying ruling.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

The Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard

Rotterdam D. · Aug 27, 2025

NetherlandsEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritytrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The court noted that the party cited fabricated ECLI numbers " When asked, Dwaard (his lawyer) stated that all this was caused by a problem converting a Word file to PDF. This statement raises questions. The court leaves these questions and the question of whether this violated Article 21 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure unanswered, because, on balance, Dwaard did not benefit from the incorrect representation of the facts in the statement of defense. " (Google Translate)

Why the court cared
The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now
Blaming 'Word-to-PDF conversion' for fabricated ECLI numbers fooled no one; own the AI use immediately when challenged.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The court noted that the party cited fabricated ECLI numbers " When asked, Dwaard (his lawyer) stated that all this was caused by a problem converting a Word file to PDF. This statement raises questions. The court leaves these questions and the question of whether this violated Article 21 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure unanswered, because, on balance, Dwaard did not benefit from the incorrect representation of the facts in the statement of defense. " (Google Translate)

Operational lesson

Blaming 'Word-to-PDF conversion' for fabricated ECLI numbers fooled no one; own the AI use immediately when challenged.

Record details

CourtRotterdam D.
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateAug 27, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The court noted that the party cited fabricated ECLI numbers
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | The court noted that some of the cited cases pertained to criminal law decisions, not to trade law jurisprudence

Questions this record answers

What happened in The Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard?
Fabricated: Case Law | The court noted that the party cited fabricated ECLI numbers " When asked, Dwaard (his lawyer) stated that all this was caused by a problem converting a Word file to PDF. This statement raises questions. The court leaves these questions and the question of whether this violated Article 21 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure unanswered, because, on balance, Dwaard did not benefit from the incorrect representation of the facts in the statement of defense. " (Google Translate)
Why does The Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard matter for legal AI risk?
Blaming 'Word-to-PDF conversion' for fabricated ECLI numbers fooled no one; own the AI use immediately when challenged.
What does the public record establish about The Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this The Boys of Rockanje v. Dwaard summary?
The recorded source is cyberlawyer.nl. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. Illinois · Sep 2, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v. Union of India & Anr.Supreme Court of India · Sep 2, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Willie C. Fortune v. CTA Certified TransmissionMissouri CA · Sep 1, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Peter Williams, et al. v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, et al.N.D. Texas · Aug 27, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)MFRD and National Disability Insurance AgencyARTA · Aug 26, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Noella P. Turgeon v. FHLMCD. New Hampshire · Aug 26, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)