Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1593298Generated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood

W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2025

Jurisdiction
federal
Court
W.D. Pennsylvania
Record ID
thomas-dexter-jakes-v-duane-youngblood-2025-10-06
Observed outcome
Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked
Known monetary consequence
$5,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Fabricated quotation attributed to the Court's April 25, 2025 Memorandum Opinion; Court found no such language in its opinion. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked. Original Show Cause Order is here.

Why the decision-maker cared

The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.

Why it matters now

Fabricated quotes ending in pro hac vice revocation — verify every quotation character-for-character against the source opinion.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Fabricated Quotes
  • Misrepresented Authority
  • Published Opinion
  • Trial
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
$5,000
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked
PRIMARY SOURCE

reason.com

Secondary or other linked source. The recorded link is not classified as an official court source or docket mirror.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Latest evidence review: Secondary Source Only (medium confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
  3. Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
  4. Escalate unresolved verification failures before filing and preserve the responsible reviewer's signoff record.