Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood
W.D. Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2025
PA / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritypublished opinion
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Fabricated quotation attributed to the Court's April 25, 2025 Memorandum Opinion; Court found no such language in its opinion. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked. Original Show Cause Order is here.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Fabricated quotes ending in pro hac vice revocation — verify every quotation character-for-character against the source opinion.
Why this matter is tracked
False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Fabricated quotation attributed to the Court's April 25, 2025 Memorandum Opinion; Court found no such language in its opinion. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked. Original Show Cause Order is here.
Operational lesson
Fabricated quotes ending in pro hac vice revocation — verify every quotation character-for-character against the source opinion.
Record details
PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtW.D. Pennsylvania
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit3rd Circuit
DateOct 6, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked
Known amount$5,000
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
10 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Fabricated quotation attributed to the Court's April 25, 2025 Memorandum Opinion; Court found no such language in its opinion.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Fabricated quote attributed to Franklin Prescriptions, Inc. v. N.Y. Times Co.; Court found the quoted language does not exist in that opinion as cited.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Fabricated statement attributed to Franklin Prescriptions requiring pleading 'the exact words spoken or published'; Court found no such direct quotation in the cited authority.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Fabricated quotation purporting to be from Blackwell v. Eskin (Pa. Super. Ct. 2007); Court found the quoted language does not exist as presented.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Fabricated attribution claiming the Court 'noted that when the underlying tort collapses, there can be no cause of action for conspiracy' citing Hill v. Cosby; Court found the phrasing was not in the cited source.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Fabricated quotation attributed to Romano v. Young (E.D. Pa. 2011) claiming a specific holding about conspiracy pleadings; Court found the specific quoted language absent from that decision.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Fabricated quotation attributed to Duffy v. Lawyers Title Ins. Co. about group pleading in conspiracy claims; Court determined the quoted passage was not in the cited opinion as presented.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Multiple fabricated or partly fabricated quotations in the reply brief (e.g., Kurowski, Livingston, Moses, St. Amant) that the Court found do not exist in the cited authorities as quoted.
Show 2 additional discrepancies
- False Quotes: Case Law | Reply brief quotation claiming Pennsylvania courts 'have shown a willingness to interpret relatively mild statements as being capable of a defamatory meaning' attributed to Livingston v. Murray; Court found the quoted wording was fabricated.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Misrepresentation: citing cases for propositions they do not support; Court noted multiple instances where Blackbum used cases for propositions the cases do not represent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood?
- False Quotes: Exhibits & Submissions | Fabricated quotation attributed to the Court's April 25, 2025 Memorandum Opinion; Court found no such language in its opinion. Outcome: Monetary Sanction; Pro Hac Vice status revoked. Original Show Cause Order is here.
- Why does Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood matter for legal AI risk?
- Fabricated quotes ending in pro hac vice revocation — verify every quotation character-for-character against the source opinion.
- What does the public record establish about Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded link is a secondary or other public source and should be checked against the docket where available. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Thomas Dexter Jakes v. Duane Youngblood summary?
- The recorded source is reason.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.