Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1PQI1RKGenerated August 4, 2026Evidence checked Aug 4, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

TOV Realty, LLC v. Suarez; Kosel Equity, LLC v. MacGregor

SC Connecticut · Jul 31, 2026

Jurisdiction
state
Court
SC Connecticut
Record ID
tov-realty-llc-v-suarez-kosel-equity-llc-v-macgregor-2026-07-31
Observed outcome
6 hours CLE; Monetary Fine
Known monetary consequence
$1,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | ChatGPT added new case citations or altered existing citations in draft applications and briefs, resulting in approximately seven erroneous and unverified case citations in filings. Outcome: 6 hours CLE; Monetary Fine.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies fake citations and other and records 6 hours CLE; Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects fake citations and other with 6 hours CLE; Monetary Fine in SC Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • Monetary
  • Professional
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
ChatGPT
Known monetary consequence
$1,000
Procedural posture
6 hours CLE; Monetary Fine
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.