Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1XX4LASGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Tsafrir v. Goldberg

Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
Supreme Court
Record ID
tsafrir-v-goldberg-2025-12-14
Observed outcome
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay 3,000 ILS in costs to the state.
Known monetary consequence
₪3,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Israeli Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's petition for leave to appeal and imposed a 3,000 ILS fine payable to the state treasury. The court sanctioned the applicant for repeatedly citing non-existent legal precedents and failing to verify the accuracy of her legal arguments despite prior judicial warnings.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Supreme Court, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
₪3,000
Procedural posture
Application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court following a District Court judgment.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court refers to the applicant's reliance on non-existent precedents, implying the use of an external tool.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.