Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1XX4LASGenerated October 26, 2026Evidence checked Oct 25, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Tsafrir v. Goldberg

Supreme Court · Dec 14, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
Supreme Court
Record ID
tsafrir-v-goldberg-2025-12-14
Observed outcome
Application dismissed; applicant ordered to pay 3,000 ILS in costs to the state.
Known monetary consequence
ILS 3,000
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The Israeli Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's petition for leave to appeal and imposed a 3,000 ILS fine payable to the state treasury. The court sanctioned the applicant for repeatedly citing non-existent legal precedents and failing to verify the accuracy of her legal arguments despite prior judicial warnings.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law

Why it matters now

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Supreme Court, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Other
  • Trial
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Unspecified
Recorded tool
No tool named in source
Known monetary consequence
ILS 3,000
Procedural posture
Application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court following a District Court judgment.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court refers to the applicant's reliance on non-existent precedents, implying the use of an external tool.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.