AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 5, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 3, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській області
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській області

Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2026

UkraineEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Grand Chamber decision dated 2018-12-04 in case No. 826/2042/16. The court found that no such Grand Chamber decision existed in that case.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Supreme Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Grand Chamber decision dated 2018-12-04 in case No. 826/2042/16. The court found that no such Grand Chamber decision existed in that case.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Supreme Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtSupreme Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateFeb 3, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Grand Chamber decision dated 2018-12-04 in case No. 826/2042/16. The court found that no such Grand Chamber decision existed in that case.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Grand Chamber decision dated 2019-04-10 in case No. 9901/2/19. The court found that no such decision existed; it also found that the actual 2019-10-24 decision did not contain the asserted conclusion concerning an effective legal remedy.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Supreme Court decision dated 2019-03-06 in case No. 826/8917/17. The court found that no such decision existed; it further found that the actual 2021-09-08 decision did not contain the asserted conclusion concerning the court’s official-duty principle.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Supreme Court decision dated 2019-01-30 in case No. 826/12123/16. The court found that no such decision existed; it further found that the actual 2018-12-20 decision did not contain the asserted conclusion that a court may not deny relief based on formal limits of the claim.
  5. Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Supreme Court decision dated 2020-02-11 in case No. 520/9708/18. The court found that no such decision existed and concluded that the cited case numbers and dates were fabricated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській області?
Fabricated: Case Law | The appeal cited a purported Grand Chamber decision dated 2018-12-04 in case No. 826/2042/16. The court found that no such Grand Chamber decision existed in that case.
Why does ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській області matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Supreme Court. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській області?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this ОСОБА_1 v. Головне управління Пенсійного фонду України в Кіровоградській області summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Chen v. Goodmore Investments & TawaSupreme Court · May 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsGummadi Usha Rani & Anr. v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao & Anr.Supreme Court · Feb 27, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsJones v. Family Court at WhangareiSupreme Court · Feb 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsHusni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al.Supreme Court · Jan 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsHerzel Hagigi v. Official ReceiverSupreme Court · Dec 28, 2025same court · pro se + fake citationsTsafrir v. GoldbergSupreme Court · Dec 14, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations