Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association
D. Connecticut · Aug 5, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- D. Connecticut
- Record ID
- ulish-kerry-terrace-booker-iii-v-u-s-bank-national-association-2026-08-05
- Observed outcome
- Admonishment and warning
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment and warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Misrepresented Authority
- Bankruptcy
- Trial
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- Gemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Admonishment and warning
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
Gemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Confirm that each authority supports the stated proposition and has not been mischaracterized.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.