Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
D. Connecticut · Aug 5, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment and warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
Gemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Admonishment and warning
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Case citation in brief does not exist or points to unrelated reporter content.
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | Appellant misquoted Rule 17(a); Court identified the quoted language as incorrect compared to the rule's actual wording.
- False Quotes: Legal Norm | Appellant attributed a quotation to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011(b) that is actually from Fed. R. Civ. P. 11.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited U.S. Supreme Court case 'Mathews v. Dillon' does not exist at the provided citation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Cited bankruptcy Lexis entry was nonexistent; Court could not find the reported decision.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation given with incorrect forum/locale; the cited opinion exists but not from the court/location claimed.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Case cited with incorrect court designation (wrong district) in appellant's table of authorities.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.
- Why does Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.