Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 9, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 6, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesUlish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association

D. Connecticut · Aug 5, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment and warning. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

ConnecticutSingle-state evidence scope
Explore CTOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtD. Connecticut
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateAug 5, 2026
GE
AI toolGemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdmonishment and warning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Gemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPT is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment and warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

8 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Case citation in brief does not exist or points to unrelated reporter content.
  3. False Quotes: Legal Norm | Appellant misquoted Rule 17(a); Court identified the quoted language as incorrect compared to the rule's actual wording.
  4. False Quotes: Legal Norm | Appellant attributed a quotation to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011(b) that is actually from Fed. R. Civ. P. 11.
  5. Fabricated: Case Law | Cited U.S. Supreme Court case 'Mathews v. Dillon' does not exist at the provided citation.
  6. Fabricated: Case Law | Cited bankruptcy Lexis entry was nonexistent; Court could not find the reported decision.
  7. Misrepresented: Case Law | Citation given with incorrect forum/locale; the cited opinion exists but not from the court/location claimed.
  8. Misrepresented: Case Law | Case cited with incorrect court designation (wrong district) in appellant's table of authorities.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association?
Fabricated: Case Law | Nonexistent case cited in the brief; Court could not locate the opinion or support in the reporter cited. Outcome: Admonishment and warning.
Why does Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment and warning in D. Connecticut. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National Association summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.