Vicki Boomer v. Hospital Employees' Union and Interior Health Authority
British Columbia LRB · Dec 16, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- British Columbia LRB
- Record ID
- vicki-boomer-v-hospital-employees-union-and-interior-health-authority-2025-12-16
- Observed outcome
- The application was dismissed in its entirety.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The British Columbia Labour Relations Board dismissed the applicant's claims after identifying that the application contained fabricated statutory provisions and non-existent case law citations. The Board explicitly noted these errors as characteristic of generative AI hallucinations and reminded future applicants of their duty to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of all filed legal materials.
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Applicant cited "Section 6(3)(h)" of the Labour Relations Code; the Board observed that no such provision exists and could not determine what was referenced. || Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant cited a "Teamsters case (BCLRB No. B135/2022)"; the Board noted there is no case bearing that citation and that the citation appears fabricated. || Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Applicant referred to "Section 13" as if it were a provision of the Labour Relations Code when it is a section of the Human Rights Code; the Board identified this misattribution.
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in British Columbia LRB, with the listed outcome: no adjudicated outcome recorded.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Employment
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- Generative AI (unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The Board dismissed the application pursuant to Section 13 of the Labour Relations Code, finding that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie breach of the Code or disclose an apparent breach of the duty of fair representation.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The Board noted the application bore hallmarks of generative AI.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Confirm that every authority actually supports the proposition for which it is offered.