Vokshi v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Federal Court of Canada · Nov 3, 2026
Short answer. Status: Application for judicial review dismissed without costs; no professional or monetary sanction imposed; amount: no amount stated. Federal Court of Canada, decision date on record November 3, 2026. As of November 6, 2026. Court source · Methodology
- Jurisdiction
- International
- Court
- Federal Court of Canada
- Record ID
- vokshi-v-canada-citizenship-and-immigration-2026-11-03
- Observed outcome
- Application for judicial review dismissed without costs; no professional or monetary sanction imposed.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | The Applicant’s memorandum cited numerous non-existent or mismatched Canadian cases, and the cited authorities did not support the legal principles asserted. The Court stated that the citations were so obviously fabricated that it was unnecessary to determine whether they resulted from clerical errors. Outcome: Application for judicial review dismissed without costs; no professional or monetary sanction imposed.. The Applicant’s memorandum relied on numerous incorrect and apparently non-existent neutral citations, and the cited authorities did not support the legal propositions for which they were offered. The Court found that, apart from Vavilov, Baker, and Hassani, the citations had styles of cause that did not match the cited authorities and appeared to have been generated by artificial intelligence. The Court criticized the failure to declare AI use or address the erroneous authorities, but dismissed the judicial review on the merits without costs.
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Application for judicial review dismissed without costs; no professional or monetary sanction imposed.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Application for judicial review dismissed without costs; no professional or monetary sanction imposed. in Federal Court of Canada. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- Monetary
- Case Dismissed
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Application for judicial review dismissed without costs; no professional or monetary sanction imposed.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.