Wagner v. Robinson
CA New Mexico · Jun 29, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- state
- Court
- CA New Mexico
- Record ID
- wagner-v-robinson-2026-06-29
- Observed outcome
- The court affirmed the district court's order and judgment for $17,345.61 in unpaid GAL fees.
- Known monetary consequence
- $17,346
Why this matter warrants attention
The court admonished the respondent for citing non-existent or irrelevant legal authority, noting that litigants have an obligation to provide accurate information regardless of whether they use AI tools. The court affirmed the underlying judgment for $17,345.61 in guardian ad litem fees.
The court reasoned that the respondent failed to identify facts in the record to support his claims, relied on non-existent or irrelevant authority, and failed to demonstrate reversible error, noting that self-represented litigants are held to the same standards as counsel.
This case illustrates judicial scrutiny of filings by self-represented litigants who use AI, reinforcing that the duty of candor and the requirement for accurate legal research apply equally to all litigants, regardless of their use of technology.
Failure modes and consequences
- Pro Se
- Fake Citations
- Family
- Appellate
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Implied
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- $17,346
- Procedural posture
- Appeal from a district court order regarding guardian ad litem fees; the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's judgment.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The court referenced the respondent's use of an artificial intelligence tool.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Implement mandatory verification protocols for all legal citations, especially when using generative AI tools.
- Ensure that all factual assertions in filings are directly supported by the record to avoid summary dismissal.
- Maintain strict compliance with court rules and procedural requirements, as self-represented status does not excuse non-compliance.