Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Wagner v. Robinson
CA New Mexico · Jun 29, 2026
NM / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsfamilyappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found that much of the legal authority cited by respondent "either does not exist or does not support his contentions." Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Admonishment; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found that much of the legal authority cited by respondent "either does not exist or does not support his contentions." Outcome: Admonishment.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
New MexicoSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA New Mexico
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit10th Circuit
DateJun 29, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Admonishment
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found that much of the legal authority cited by respondent "either does not exist or does not support his contentions."
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Wagner v. Robinson?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found that much of the legal authority cited by respondent "either does not exist or does not support his contentions." Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why does Wagner v. Robinson matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Admonishment in CA New Mexico, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Wagner v. Robinson?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Wagner v. Robinson summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.