Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-14R9RA2Generated September 11, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Wang, Fengxi (Re)

Ontario SCJ · Dec 1, 2025

Jurisdiction
international
Court
Ontario SCJ
Record ID
wang-fengxi-re-2025-12-01
Observed outcome
The bankruptcy application was granted; the court issued an admonishment regarding the use of AI-generated fabricated authorities.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court identified multiple fabricated case citations in the litigant's submissions, which it attributed to the likely use of artificial intelligence. The court admonished the litigant for the waste of judicial resources caused by these non-existent authorities but declined to impose an immediate sanction, reserving the right to do so in the future.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Humaira, 2019 ONCA 667' which the court could not locate on CanLII; court concluded it was a non-existent authority likely generated by AI. || Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Rehmani, 2017 ONCA 615' which the court could not verify and found the neutral citation did not match the stated style of cause. || Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. St-Onge, 2001 SKCA 117' but the court was unable to locate that style of cause and concluded it was erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Re H.Y. Louie Co. Ltd., 2001 BCSC 556' for contingent guarantee principles but the court could not verify the citation on CanLII and found it inconsistent with the authorities it purported to rely on.

Why it matters now

Ontario SCJ admonishments for AI fabrications are stacking up in reported reasons — the public record compounds over time.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Hallucinated_case_law
  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Bankruptcy
  • Trial
  • Warning
AI attribution
Implied
Recorded tool
AI (unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Contested bankruptcy application heard on October 21 and November 10, 2025, resulting in a granted bankruptcy order.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The court concluded the litigant likely used AI to generate the non-existent authorities.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.