HomeCasesWang, Fengxi (Re)

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Wang, Fengxi (Re)

Ontario SCJ · Dec 1, 2025

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsbankruptcytrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Humaira, 2019 ONCA 667' which the court could not locate on CanLII; court concluded it was a non-existent authority likely generated by AI. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Humaira, 2019 ONCA 667' which the court could not locate on CanLII; court concluded it was a non-existent authority likely generated by AI. || Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Rehmani, 2017 ONCA 615' which the court could not verify and found the neutral citation did not match the stated style of cause. || Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. St-Onge, 2001 SKCA 117' but the court was unable to locate that style of cause and concluded it was erroneous. || Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Re H.Y. Louie Co. Ltd., 2001 BCSC 556' for contingent guarantee principles but the court could not verify the citation on CanLII and found it inconsistent with the authorities it purported to rely on.
Why it matters now: Ontario SCJ admonishments for AI fabrications are stacking up in reported reasons — the public record compounds over time.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Ontario SCJ admonishments for AI fabrications are stacking up in reported reasons — the public record compounds over time.

Record details

CourtOntario SCJ

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateDec 1, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Humaira, 2019 ONCA 667' which the court could not locate on CanLII; court concluded it was a non-existent authority likely generated by AI.
Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Rehmani, 2017 ONCA 615' which the court could not verify and found the neutral citation did not match the stated style of cause.
Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. St-Onge, 2001 SKCA 117' but the court was unable to locate that style of cause and concluded it was erroneous.
Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Re H.Y. Louie Co. Ltd., 2001 BCSC 556' for contingent guarantee principles but the court could not verify the citation on CanLII and found it inconsistent with the authorities it purported to rely on.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Wang, Fengxi (Re)?: Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Humaira, 2019 ONCA 667' which the court could not locate on CanLII; court concluded it was a non-existent authority likely generated by AI. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Wang, Fengxi (Re) matter for legal AI risk?: Ontario SCJ admonishments for AI fabrications are stacking up in reported reasons — the public record compounds over time.
What does the public record establish about Wang, Fengxi (Re)?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Wang, Fengxi (Re) summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Waddell (Re)Ontario SCJ · Jan 20, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Re NicholsonOntario SCJ · Feb 18, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations X.L. v. Z.L. et alOntario SCJ · Oct 16, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Attorney General v. $32,000 in Canadian CurrencyOntario SCJ · Jun 16, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Nady v. Al Sadi, 2026 ONSC 3760Ontario SCJ · Jun 26, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Marper Holdings Limited v. Foxpark Development CorporationOntario SCJ · Jun 2, 2026same court · pro se + bankruptcy

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Ontario SCJ admonishments for AI fabrications are stacking up in reported reasons — the public record compounds over time.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Humaira, 2019 ONCA 667' which the court could not locate on CanLII; court concluded it was a non-existent authority likely generated by AI.

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. Rehmani, 2017 ONCA 615' which the court could not verify and found the neutral citation did not match the stated style of cause.

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Royal Bank v. St-Onge, 2001 SKCA 117' but the court was unable to locate that style of cause and concluded it was erroneous.

Fabricated: Case Law | Wang cited 'Re H.Y. Louie Co. Ltd., 2001 BCSC 556' for contingent guarantee principles but the court could not verify the citation on CanLII and found it inconsistent with the authorities it purported to rely on.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Wang, Fengxi (Re)?

Why does Wang, Fengxi (Re) matter for legal AI risk?

Ontario SCJ admonishments for AI fabrications are stacking up in reported reasons — the public record compounds over time.

What does the public record establish about Wang, Fengxi (Re)?

Which source supports this Wang, Fengxi (Re) summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.