Woodrow Jackson v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
M.D. Georgia · Jul 14, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- M.D. Georgia
- Record ID
- woodrow-jackson-v-auto-owners-insurance-company-2025-07-14
- Observed outcome
- Monetary sanction of $1,000, mandatory AI ethics CLE, and reimbursement of defendant's attorney fees and costs.
- Known monetary consequence
- $1,000
Why this matter warrants attention
The court sanctioned attorney Brian Braddy for violating Rule 11 by filing a document containing nine hallucinated case citations generated by AI. The court ordered a $1,000 payment to the court registry, mandatory AI ethics CLE, and reimbursement of the defendant's attorney fees and costs.
The court determined that while the attorney did not act in bad faith, the failure to verify citations before filing constituted a violation of Rule 11(b). The court emphasized that attorneys cannot delegate the duty of verifying legal authority to AI and that the failure to review AI-generated drafts is equivalent to allowing unlicensed practice.
Staff transitions are no excuse; require a partner-level signoff verifying every cited case exists before any brief is filed.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- Monetary
- Professional
- AI attribution
- Admitted
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- $1,000
- Procedural posture
- Post-hearing order following a show cause proceeding regarding Rule 11 violations for the submission of non-existent case law.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
Counsel admitted using AI software to generate the response.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Implement a mandatory partner-level signoff process for all case citations before filing.
- Establish a verification protocol requiring manual cross-referencing of all AI-generated legal authorities.
- Ensure all filings are reviewed for accuracy regardless of whether they were generated by staff or AI tools.