Which source supports this Medical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesMedical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al.

Evidence review: primary document verified. The linked primary document was extracted and checked with page-level evidence locators.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passes the current publication gate; that is not a legal-editorial review or a guarantee that every field has been independently verified.

Corpus matter record

Medical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al.

M.D. Georgia · Nov 18, 2025

GA / federal Editorial impact: high fake citations misrepresented authority contract trial Warning Monetary

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

The court sanctioned attorney Jason Gordon for violating Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(2) by submitting AI-generated briefs containing fabricated case citations. The court issued a public admonishment and ordered the attorney to pay the opposing party's reasonable attorney's fees associated with responding to the erroneous filings.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Integrity cited Truist Bank v. Buerge, 2022 WL 17541757, at *6 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 8, 2022); court conducted independent search and could not locate the opinion; citation remained in Integrity's final amended response. || Fabricated: Case Law | Alleged citation Mission Critical Sols., LLC v. Connolly, 2021 WL 5985016 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 16, 2021) appeared in earlier filing but was not in the final amended response; court could not locate the opinion in its searches. || Fabricated: Case Law | Alleged citation 'Bliss, 279 Ga. App. At 807' appeared in earlier briefing and could not be located by the court's searches. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Integrity is alleged to have misrepresented the holding of Encompass Off. Sols., Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc.; the court read Encompass and found Defendants' allegation that the holding was misstated to be credible.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in M.D. Georgia, with the listed outcome: Cost Order and Public Admonishment.

Why this matter is tracked

In an ancillary proceeding, the court addressed Rule 11(b)(2) violations by attorney Jason Gordon, who submitted briefs containing fabricated case citations generated by AI. Gordon admitted to using AI to draft the filings and failing to verify the accuracy of the citations. The court found that Gordon violated his duty to ensure legal contentions were warranted by existing law. While the court publicly admonished Gordon for the conduct, it noted his candor, acceptance of responsibility, and proactive remedial actions, including firm-wide procedural changes and continuing education. The court ordered Gordon to pay the opposing party's reasonable attorney's fees incurred due to the research required to address the non-existent citations, but declined to impose further monetary sanctions.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in M.D. Georgia, with the listed outcome: Cost Order and Public Admonishment.

Record details

GeorgiaSingle-state evidence scope

Explore GAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtM.D. Georgia

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit11th Circuit

DateNov 18, 2025

AI toolunspecified AI

Party typeLawyer

OutcomePublic admonishment and an order to pay the opposing party's reasonable attorney's fees.

Known amount$10,000

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

admitted

The attorney admitted to using AI to draft the briefs.

Procedural posture

Ancillary proceeding following an order to show cause regarding potential Rule 11(b) violations.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Integrity cited Truist Bank v. Buerge, 2022 WL 17541757, at *6 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 8, 2022); court conducted independent search and could not locate the opinion; citation remained in Integrity's final amended response.
Fabricated: Case Law | Alleged citation Mission Critical Sols., LLC v. Connolly, 2021 WL 5985016 (M.D. Ga. Dec. 16, 2021) appeared in earlier filing but was not in the final amended response; court could not locate the opinion in its searches.
Fabricated: Case Law | Alleged citation 'Bliss, 279 Ga. App. At 807' appeared in earlier briefing and could not be located by the court's searches.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Integrity is alleged to have misrepresented the holding of Encompass Off. Sols., Inc. v. Ingenix, Inc.; the court read Encompass and found Defendants' allegation that the holding was misstated to be credible.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Medical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al.?: The court sanctioned attorney Jason Gordon for violating Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)(2) by submitting AI-generated briefs containing fabricated case citations. The court issued a public admonishment and ordered the attorney to pay the opposing party's reasonable attorney's fees associated with responding to the erroneous filings.
Why does Medical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Lawyer filing issue in M.D. Georgia, with the listed outcome: Cost Order and Public Admonishment.
What does the public record establish about Medical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Medical Buyers Group LLC d/b/a Integrity v. Candice Pence, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Woodrow Jackson v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyM.D. Georgia · Jul 14, 2025same court · fake citations + contract Chamberlain v. City of AlbanyM.D. Georgia · May 1, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Tamisha Shaw v. Coast Dental of Georgia et al/SC Georgia · Jan 6, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Tiffany Regina Ringer v. Bank of America, N.A.N.D. Georgia · Dec 30, 2025same jurisdiction · misrepresented authority + contract In re: Loletha Hale, Esq. (Boston v. Williams)N.D. Georgia · Oct 28, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority AndDone, LLC v. Shante Gaines; Reset Financial Group, LLCW.D. Missouri · Aug 25, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Evidence-review statusprimary document verified

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Evidence review recorded Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Sep 11, 2026; latest tracked decision Sep 9, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open M.D. Georgia profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology