YK v. The High State Prosecutor's Office in Prague)
Supreme Administrative Court · Oct 15, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Supreme Administrative Court
- Record ID
- yk-v-the-high-state-prosecutors-office-in-prague-2025-10-15
- Observed outcome
- The cassation complaint was dismissed, and the court denied the plaintiff's request for reimbursement of costs related to the submissions containing fabricated citations.
- Known monetary consequence
- CZK 0
Why this matter warrants attention
The court identified that the plaintiff's submissions contained fabricated case law citations and false quotations. As a result, the court determined the submissions were unhelpful and denied the plaintiff's request for the reimbursement of legal costs associated with those specific filings.
The court reasoned that the plaintiff's submissions were unhelpful due to the inclusion of non-existent case law and misattributed quotations, justifying the denial of associated legal costs.
Supreme Administrative Court verifies every quoted passage — phantom quotes surface on first read.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Fabricated Quotes
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- CZK 0
- Procedural posture
- Cassation appeal before the Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic following a judgment by the Municipal Court in Prague.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Compare every quoted passage and pincite directly with the underlying opinion or filing.
- Apply the same source-checking controls to AI (implied, unspecified) output as to any other research input.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.