Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
YK v. The High State Prosecutor's Office in Prague)
Supreme Administrative Court · Oct 15, 2025
Czech RepublicEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotesadministrativetrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In YK v. the High State Prosecutor’s Office in Prague, the Czech Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the cassation complaint. While assessing costs, it found that extensive submissions contained quotations absent from the cited decisions and four decisions that did not exist at all. The court treated the material as unhelpful and did not award the costs of preparing those submissions.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is the response recorded in the linked source; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Supreme Administrative Court verifies every quoted passage — phantom quotes surface on first read.
Why this matter is tracked
In YK v. the High State Prosecutor’s Office in Prague, the Czech Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the cassation complaint. While assessing costs, it found that extensive submissions contained quotations absent from the cited decisions and four decisions that did not exist at all. The court treated the material as unhelpful and did not award the costs of preparing those submissions.
Operational lesson
Supreme Administrative Court verifies every quoted passage — phantom quotes surface on first read.
Record details
CourtSupreme Administrative Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 15, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found several referenced decisions do not exist (fabricated case citations).
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court verified quoted excerpts and concluded none of the cited passages appear in the referenced decisions (misattributed/false quotations).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in YK v. The High State Prosecutor's Office in Prague)?
- In YK v. the High State Prosecutor’s Office in Prague, the Czech Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the cassation complaint. While assessing costs, it found that extensive submissions contained quotations absent from the cited decisions and four decisions that did not exist at all. The court treated the material as unhelpful and did not award the costs of preparing those submissions.
- Why does YK v. The High State Prosecutor's Office in Prague) matter for legal AI risk?
- Supreme Administrative Court verifies every quoted passage — phantom quotes surface on first read.
- What does the public record establish about YK v. The High State Prosecutor's Office in Prague)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this YK v. The High State Prosecutor's Office in Prague) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.