Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC
W.D. Texas · Jan 20, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- federal
- Court
- W.D. Texas
- Record ID
- yue-v-reaction-labs-llc-2026-01-20
- Observed outcome
- The court granted the motion to vacate the preliminary injunction.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
The court vacated a preliminary injunction after finding the asserted patent vulnerable due to a USPTO non-final office action. Additionally, the court identified that the Counter-Plaintiff misrepresented legal authority in its briefing and that the original opinion contained invalid or non-existent case law citations.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified Lup's citation to Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., No. 9:07-cv-196, 2009 WL 763926, at *10 as impossible because the cited order exists but is only eight pages long, making a page *10 citation incorrect. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted Lup's citation to Fiber Sys. Int'l v. Applied Optical Sys., 2009 WL 8590962, at *8-9 is incorrect because the order is only six pages and was published on June 24, 2009 (not March 2009) — indicating misdated/mispaginated citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Editor’s note and court flagged that the opinion contains citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist, preserving invalid citations as part of the record.
Verify pinpoint page cites against the actual opinion length before filing — impossible pincites are the cheapest hallucination tell.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Misrepresented Authority
- Published Opinion
- Ip
- Trial
- Warning
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- The court granted the Counter-Defendants' Opposed Motion to Vacate Preliminary Injunction, vacating the PI previously issued against them.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
- Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.