HomeCasesYue v. Reaction Labs, LLC

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC

W.D. Texas · Jan 20, 2026

TX / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authoritypublished opinionip

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified Lup's citation to Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., No. 9:07-cv-196, 2009 WL 763926, at *10 as impossible because the cited order exists but is only eight pages long, making a page *10 citation incorrect. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified Lup's citation to Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., No. 9:07-cv-196, 2009 WL 763926, at *10 as impossible because the cited order exists but is only eight pages long, making a page *10 citation incorrect. || Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted Lup's citation to Fiber Sys. Int'l v. Applied Optical Sys., 2009 WL 8590962, at *8-9 is incorrect because the order is only six pages and was published on June 24, 2009 (not March 2009) — indicating misdated/mispaginated citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Editor’s note and court flagged that the opinion contains citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist, preserving invalid citations as part of the record.
Why it matters now: Verify pinpoint page cites against the actual opinion length before filing — impossible pincites are the cheapest hallucination tell.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Verify pinpoint page cites against the actual opinion length before filing — impossible pincites are the cheapest hallucination tell.

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtW.D. Texas

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit5th Circuit

DateJan 20, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified Lup's citation to Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., No. 9:07-cv-196, 2009 WL 763926, at *10 as impossible because the cited order exists but is only eight pages long, making a page *10 citation incorrect.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted Lup's citation to Fiber Sys. Int'l v. Applied Optical Sys., 2009 WL 8590962, at *8-9 is incorrect because the order is only six pages and was published on June 24, 2009 (not March 2009) — indicating misdated/mispaginated citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Editor’s note and court flagged that the opinion contains citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist, preserving invalid citations as part of the record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Court identified Lup's citation to Cummins-Allison Corp. v. SBM Co., No. 9:07-cv-196, 2009 WL 763926, at *10 as impossible because the cited order exists but is only eight pages long, making a page *10 citation incorrect. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC matter for legal AI risk?: Verify pinpoint page cites against the actual opinion length before filing — impossible pincites are the cheapest hallucination tell.
What does the public record establish about Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ericka Holmes v. The University of Texas at AustinW.D. Texas · Feb 4, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Thackston v. DriscollW.D. Texas · Aug 28, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Gonzalez v. Texas Taxpayers and Research AssociationW.D. Texas · Jan 29, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Rene Carbonell v. United States of AmericaW.D. Texas · Jun 30, 2026same court · fake citations + trial David Thomas v. The Quikrete Companies, LLCW.D. Texas · Feb 26, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Thomas Duncan v. Gridhawk et al.W.D. Texas · Dec 6, 2025same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Verify pinpoint page cites against the actual opinion length before filing — impossible pincites are the cheapest hallucination tell.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Court noted Lup's citation to Fiber Sys. Int'l v. Applied Optical Sys., 2009 WL 8590962, at *8-9 is incorrect because the order is only six pages and was published on June 24, 2009 (not March 2009) — indicating misdated/mispaginated citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Editor’s note and court flagged that the opinion contains citation references that are incorrect or do not actually exist, preserving invalid citations as part of the record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC?

Why does Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC matter for legal AI risk?

Verify pinpoint page cites against the actual opinion length before filing — impossible pincites are the cheapest hallucination tell.

What does the public record establish about Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC?

Which source supports this Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLC summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.