Zlatin v. Assayag et al
Jerusalem Magistrate's Court · Jul 11, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Jerusalem Magistrate's Court
- Record ID
- zlatin-v-assayag-et-al-2025-07-11
- Observed outcome
- The court ordered the plaintiff to pay 20,000 ILS in costs to the defendants and 5,000 ILS to the state treasury.
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪25,000
Why this matter warrants attention
The court imposed a monetary penalty on the plaintiff, ordering payment of 20,000 ILS in costs to the defendants and 5,000 ILS to the state treasury, specifically due to the submission of a closing brief containing fabricated case law and statutes.
The court reasoned that the plaintiff's inclusion of non-existent citations caused a waste of time and resources for the defendants and the court. It characterized the submission as showing contempt and severity, justifying exemplary costs.
Filing an AI-generated draft with placeholder prompts triggers exemplary costs; require a final-review checklist before submission.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Contract
- Trial
- Monetary
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- ₪25,000
- Procedural posture
- Final judgment in a civil contract dispute before the Jerusalem Magistrate's Court.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).
Controls suggested by the public record
- Implement a mandatory final-review checklist to ensure all citations are verified against official legal databases before filing.
- Prohibit the filing of documents containing instructional placeholders or template-generated text.
- Establish a verification protocol for all AI-assisted drafting to confirm the existence and accuracy of cited statutes and case law.