HomeCasesPinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency

Jerusalem Magistrate's Court · Aug 3, 2025

IsraelEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsbankruptcytrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Monetary sanction. The motion containing the fabrications had been withdrawn after the litigant was confronted, but the sanction was imposed nonetheless.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary sanction; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Withdrawing the motion does not purge the sanction — Israeli courts punish the filing, not just reliance at hearing.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Monetary sanction. The motion containing the fabrications had been withdrawn after the litigant was confronted, but the sanction was imposed nonetheless.

Operational lesson

Withdrawing the motion does not purge the sanction — Israeli courts punish the filing, not just reliance at hearing.

Record details

CourtJerusalem Magistrate's Court

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 3, 2025

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeMonetary sanction

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law
Fabricated: Legal Norm

Questions this record answers

What happened in Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency?: Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Monetary sanction. The motion containing the fabrications had been withdrawn after the litigant was confronted, but the sanction was imposed nonetheless.
Why does Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency matter for legal AI risk?: Withdrawing the motion does not purge the sanction — Israeli courts punish the filing, not just reliance at hearing.
What does the public record establish about Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Zlatin v. Assayag et alJerusalem Magistrate's Court · Jul 11, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Re Gary Man Kin NgOntario SCJ (Bankruptcy) · Mar 2, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Chu v DarmaliFCA · Dec 8, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified JML Rose Pty Ltd v Jorgensen (No 3)Federal Court of Australia · Aug 19, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified In re Sonja Helvig DeRosa-GrundS.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · Aug 18, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified In re Eugene Ezra PerkinsD. Oregon (Bankruptcy) · Jul 7, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Monetary sanction. The motion containing the fabrications had been withdrawn after the litigant was confronted, but the sanction was imposed nonetheless.

Operational lesson

Withdrawing the motion does not purge the sanction — Israeli courts punish the filing, not just reliance at hearing.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency?

Fabricated: Case Law Outcome: Monetary sanction. The motion containing the fabrications had been withdrawn after the litigant was confronted, but the sanction was imposed nonetheless.

Why does Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency matter for legal AI risk?

Withdrawing the motion does not purge the sanction — Israeli courts punish the filing, not just reliance at hearing.

What does the public record establish about Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency?

Which source supports this Pinchas v. Supervisor of Insolvency summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.