2026 CanLII 107034 (CA VRAB)
Veterans Review and Appeal Board · Apr 15, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- Veterans Review and Appeal Board
- Record ID
- 2026-canlii-107034-ca-vrab-2026-04-15
- Observed outcome
- None Adjudicated
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | The Panel searched the cited journal and could not locate the purported systematic review or find supportive scientific literature corresponding to the citation. The Panel found that the Nurse Practitioner used AI to generate the medical opinion and its references without verifying them. It determined that the cited Veterans Affairs Canada eye-condition eligibility guideline did not exist and that the two purported journal articles could not be located in the cited journals or elsewhere. The Panel concluded that the opinion’s substantive medical conclusions also appeared to be AI-generated and false, rendering the opinion unreliable. Because it was the only evidence supporting a service relationship, the Panel denied entitlement for right-eye keratoconus.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and administrative and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and administrative with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Veterans Review and Appeal Board. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Administrative
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Not Established
- Recorded tool
- Unidentified
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.