Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 13, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesPR Hotels (Kelowna) Ltd. v. Area 19
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

PR Hotels (Kelowna) Ltd. v. Area 19

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Courtready; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

PAAB BC · Oct 15, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | The Appellant used AI-generated statistical data to support an 8.62% business-enterprise-value deduction, but did not provide the source, methodology, or analysis. The Board found it could not determine whether the data accurately represented the relevant market and rejected the evidence. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and administrative and records Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and administrative with Adverse Costs Order in PAAB BC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | The Appellant used AI-generated statistical data to support an 8.62% business-enterprise-value deduction, but did not provide the source, methodology, or analysis. The Board found it could not determine whether the data accurately represented the relevant market and rejected the evidence. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and administrative with Adverse Costs Order in PAAB BC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtPAAB BC
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 15, 2026
First seenNov 13, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdverse Costs Order
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | The Appellant used AI-generated statistical data to support an 8.62% business-enterprise-value deduction, but did not provide the source, methodology, or analysis. The Board found it could not determine whether the data accurately represented the relevant market and rejected the evidence.
  2. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | The Appellant relied on a purported Super 8 Kelowna sale as a comparable, but did not provide supporting details or documentation. The Board found the evidence unsupported and gave it no weight; the Assessor alleged the sale was hallucinated.
  3. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | The Appellant relied on a purported Comfort Inn and Suites Kelowna sale as a comparable, but did not provide supporting details or documentation. The Board found the comparable-sale evidence unsupported and gave it no weight; the Assessor alleged the sale was hallucinated.
  4. Fabricated: Exhibits & Submissions | The Appellant relied on purported Super 8 Merritt and Versante Hotel Richmond sales in the Marriott appeal. The Versante transaction was expressly described as an estimated sale price, and no supporting documentation was produced. The Board could not ascertain whether the sales occurred and gave the Appellant’s evidence no weight.

Questions this record answers

What happened in PR Hotels (Kelowna) Ltd. v. Area 19?
Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | The Appellant used AI-generated statistical data to support an 8.62% business-enterprise-value deduction, but did not provide the source, methodology, or analysis. The Board found it could not determine whether the data accurately represented the relevant market and rejected the evidence. Outcome: Adverse Costs Order.
Why does PR Hotels (Kelowna) Ltd. v. Area 19 matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and administrative with Adverse Costs Order in PAAB BC. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about PR Hotels (Kelowna) Ltd. v. Area 19?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this PR Hotels (Kelowna) Ltd. v. Area 19 summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.