AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 2, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 1, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesChirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security

E.D. Michigan · Sep 24, 2026

MI / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authorityadministrativeMonetary
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | A nonexistent Williams case was cited as authority for the proposition that inability to sustain sitting or standing because of medically necessary leg elevation precludes competitive sedentary employment. The cited reference instead concerned Widi v. McNeil from the District of Maine and did not involve Social Security. Outcome: Monetary Fine.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | A nonexistent Williams case was cited as authority for the proposition that inability to sustain sitting or standing because of medically necessary leg elevation precludes competitive sedentary employment. The cited reference instead concerned Widi v. McNeil from the District of Maine and did not involve Social Security. Outcome: Monetary Fine.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

MichiganSingle-state evidence scope
Explore MIOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtE.D. Michigan
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit6th Circuit
DateSep 24, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine
Known amount$500
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | A nonexistent Williams case was cited as authority for the proposition that inability to sustain sitting or standing because of medically necessary leg elevation precludes competitive sedentary employment. The cited reference instead concerned Widi v. McNeil from the District of Maine and did not involve Social Security.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | A real case was quoted as holding that an ALJ must evaluate whether a claimant can sustain work activity on a regular and continuing basis, but the court found that Howard did not state that rule at the cited page.
  3. Misrepresented: Case Law | A real case was cited for the proposition that medically necessary leg elevation preventing sustained sitting or standing precludes competitive sedentary employment, but Wages did not mention leg elevation and did not support that proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security?
Fabricated: Case Law | A nonexistent Williams case was cited as authority for the proposition that inability to sustain sitting or standing because of medically necessary leg elevation precludes competitive sedentary employment. The cited reference instead concerned Widi v. McNeil from the District of Maine and did not involve Social Security. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
Why does Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Monetary Fine in E.D. Michigan. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Chirece C. v. Commissioner of Social Security summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Fay v. Warren Hospitality Suites, Inc.E.D. Michigan · Sep 9, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesKrystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.E.D. Michigan · Aug 26, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesLoyer v. Wayne County Michigan et al.E.D. Michigan · Apr 28, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesNatashah Al-Ali v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.E.D. Michigan · Jul 31, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesPatrick C. Shaltry v. Donna Collins, et al.E.D. Michigan · Jun 2, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesPizzimenti v. City of Detroit, et al.E.D. Michigan · Mar 27, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotes