APELAÇÃO CÍVEL NPU 0035599-44.2017.8.16.0014
TJPR · Jul 22, 2026
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJPR
- Record ID
- apelacao-civel-npu-0035599-44-2017-8-16-0014-2026-07-22
- Observed outcome
- Court found cited precedents could not be verified and likely invented (AI-generated); did not know the appeal (manifestly inadmissible) and ordered notification to OAB/PR for providências.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a precedent identified as 'ApCv 2003.001444-6, de Biguaçu, rel. Desa. Salete Silva Sommariva' which the court could not locate in jurisprudence databases and found likely invented or copied from an external website. Outcome: Court found cited precedents could not be verified and likely invented (AI-generated); did not know the appeal (manifestly inadmissible) and ordered notification to OAB/PR for providências.. The appellate brief contained citations and ementas the court could not locate in jurisprudence databases; the court found indications the material was invented (''jurisprudência criativa''), possibly produced by an AI or copied from an external website, and therefore not verifiable. The court treated these fabricated citations as part of a broader failure to specifically impugn the judgment (violation of dialeticity), declined to know the appeal, and directed that the OAB/PR be notified to take any appropriate measures.
The structured public record identifies fake citations and trial and records Court found cited precedents could not be verified and likely invented (AI-generated); did not know the appeal (manifestly inadmissible) and ordered notification to OAB/PR for providências.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects fake citations and trial with Court found cited precedents could not be verified and likely invented (AI-generated); did not know the appeal (manifestly inadmissible) and ordered notification to OAB/PR for providências. in TJPR. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Fake Citations
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Court found cited precedents could not be verified and likely invented (AI-generated); did not know the appeal (manifestly inadmissible) and ordered notification to OAB/PR for providências.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.