AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 14, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesGarry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

N.D. Alabama · Aug 12, 2026

AL / federalEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritycivil rightsProfessional
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation not found in the opinion. Outcome: Public reprimand; Order to Notice.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Public reprimand; Order to Notice. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Public reprimand; Order to Notice in N.D. Alabama. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation not found in the opinion. Outcome: Public reprimand; Order to Notice.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Public reprimand; Order to Notice in N.D. Alabama. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

AlabamaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore ALOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtN.D. Alabama
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateAug 12, 2026
First seenAug 16, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typeLawyer
OutcomePublic reprimand; Order to Notice
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Public reprimand; Order to Notice

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

11 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation not found in the opinion.
  2. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation not found in the opinion.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation about independent decisionmakers not contained in the cited opinion.
  4. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation about 'similarly situated' language not present as quoted.
  5. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted characterization of appellate review of agency proceedings not found in the cited opinion.
  6. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted admonition regarding judges with an interest not appearing as quoted in the cited case.
  7. False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted requirement that an official municipal policy be the 'moving force' to the cited Supreme Court decision in a way the court found unsupported.
  8. Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Mt. Healthy for the proposition that allegations of direct evidence of motive suffice at the pleading stage; court found the citation did not support the claimed proposition as presented.
Show 3 additional discrepancies
  1. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Asserted a scope of municipal contract immunity and cited an Alabama statute in a manner the court deemed a misrepresentation of that authority (combined with a fabricated case).
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent Alabama case as authority.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a non-existent Alabama case as authority.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al.?
False Quotes: Case Law | Attributed a quoted formulation not found in the opinion. Outcome: Public reprimand; Order to Notice.
Why does Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Public reprimand; Order to Notice in N.D. Alabama. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Pleasant v. BurnsN.D. Alabama · Apr 8, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesBridgett Watson Adams, et al. v. 3M CompanyN.D. Alabama · Apr 20, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesJoel A. Rivera v. Triad Properties Corporation, et al.N.D. Alabama · Mar 31, 2026same court · fake citations + fabricated quotesJohnson v. DunnN.D. Alabama · Jul 23, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityPerry v. Social Security Administration, CommissionerN.D. Alabama · Aug 3, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authorityGideon J. Sipin v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., et al.N.D. Alabama · Jul 22, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.