Public trackerCorpus refreshed Aug 16, 2026 · Latest decision Aug 13, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesRose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.

M.D. Florida · Aug 12, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case; defendant flagged it and plaintiff withdrew the citation as "incorrect or unverifiable." The Court characterized this as a fabricated citation and issued an admonishment. Outcome: Admonishment. Earlier Warning is here.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case; defendant flagged it and plaintiff withdrew the citation as "incorrect or unverifiable." The Court characterized this as a fabricated citation and issued an admonishment. Outcome: Admonishment. Earlier Warning is here.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore FLOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtM.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateAug 12, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case; defendant flagged it and plaintiff withdrew the citation as "incorrect or unverifiable." The Court characterized this as a fabricated citation and issued an admonishment.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent case; defendant flagged it and plaintiff withdrew the citation as "incorrect or unverifiable." The Court characterized this as a fabricated citation and issued an admonishment. Outcome: Admonishment. Earlier Warning is here.
Why does Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in M.D. Florida. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Rose v. Arts Bonita, Inc. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.