Apelação Cível NU 0000268-31.2023.8.16.0033 (Costarte Eireli Me. v. Churrascão Gaúcho Restaurante Ltda.)
TJPR - 9ª C. Cível · Nov 6, 2025
- Jurisdiction
- international
- Court
- TJPR - 9ª C. Cível
- Record ID
- apelacao-civel-nu-0000268-31-2023-8-16-0033-costarte-eireli-me-v-churrascao-gaucho-restaur-2025-11-06
- Observed outcome
- Court rejected the nullity/reform request based on alleged AI authorship, finding no evidence that AI composed the fundamentation or dispositive; only limited use for the sentence report was permitted by local decree.
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
Why this matter warrants attention
Outcome: Court rejected the nullity/reform request based on alleged AI authorship, finding no evidence that AI composed the fundamentation or dispositive; only limited use for the sentence report was permitted by local decree.. The appellant alleged the trial judge's sentence was entirely produced by artificial intelligence and should be annulled. The appellate court held the accusation required unequivocal proof and found none: any AI use was limited to drafting the procedural report and is authorized by Decreto Judiciário nº 421/2024/TJPR; the fundamentation and dispositive were authored by the magistrate. A minor lexical error did not establish AI authorship. The court therefore refused to annul the decision on AI-use grounds.
The structured public record identifies trial and records Court rejected the nullity/reform request based on alleged AI authorship, finding no evidence that AI composed the fundamentation or dispositive; only limited use for the sentence report was permitted by local decree.. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
This matter connects trial with Court rejected the nullity/reform request based on alleged AI authorship, finding no evidence that AI composed the fundamentation or dispositive; only limited use for the sentence report was permitted by local decree. in TJPR - 9ª C. Cível. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Failure modes and consequences
- Trial
- None Adjudicated
- AI attribution
- Reported
- Recorded tool
- AI (implied, unspecified)
- Known monetary consequence
- Not recorded
- Procedural posture
- Court rejected the nullity/reform request based on alleged AI authorship, finding no evidence that AI composed the fundamentation or dispositive; only limited use for the sentence report was permitted by local decree.
Damien Charlotin case archive
Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.
Open underlying sourceA recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.
What this record does—and does not—establish
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Controls suggested by the public record
- Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.