Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-1HZM2KNGenerated September 24, 2026Evidence checked Sep 24, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

BKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam

CA Illinois (2d) · Sep 16, 2025

Jurisdiction
state
Court
CA Illinois (2d)
Record ID
bka-holdings-llc-v-sam-2025-09-16
Observed outcome
Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order
Known monetary consequence
$1
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants relied on four cases that the court identified as hallucinated by artificial intelligence. The court did not name or analyze the individual citations in the order. Outcome: Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order.

Why the decision-maker cared

The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.

Why it matters now

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order in CA Illinois (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Pro Se
  • Fake Citations
  • Landlord Tenant
  • Appellate
  • Monetary
AI attribution
Not Established
Recorded tool
Unidentified
Known monetary consequence
$1
Procedural posture
Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify the existence, citation, court, and precedential status of every authority before filing.
  2. Read the linked source and subsequent docket history before relying on this record for legal work.