Which source supports this In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesIn re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate

CA Illinois (5d) · Aug 11, 2026

IL / state Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations misrepresented authority family Warning

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in CA Illinois (5d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in CA Illinois (5d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope

Explore ILOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.

CourtCA Illinois (5d)

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit7th Circuit

DateAug 11, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeAdmonishment

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent.

Questions this record answers

What happened in In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in CA Illinois (5d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Robert S. Hulvat v. Juli Gumina, STG Divorce Law, and Jennifer B. HulvatCA Illinois (3d) · Apr 9, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations In re Marriage of Isom and KareemCA Illinois · Jun 16, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations In re S.M., a MinorCA Illinois · Aug 7, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority In re BoyCA Illinois · Jul 21, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Barari v. BurgessCA Arizona (1d) · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Robert Hinton Avery v. Danielle BeauzilCA Florida (4d) · May 27, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 16, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 16, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open CA Illinois (5d) profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology