In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Illinois (5d) · Aug 11, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and misrepresented authority and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in CA Illinois (5d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent. Outcome: Admonishment.
This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in CA Illinois (5d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-10-30: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Admonishment
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Father's pro se appellate brief, allegedly drafted with AI, contained general citations to existing cases that did not support his propositions; Mother characterized this as fabricated precedent. Outcome: Admonishment.
- Why does In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with Admonishment in CA Illinois (5d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this In re Marriage of Katelyn Jill Tate summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.