AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Sep 24, 2026 · Latest decision Sep 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesBKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

BKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam

CA Illinois (2d) · Sep 16, 2025

IL / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationslandlord tenantappellateMonetary
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants relied on four cases that the court identified as hallucinated by artificial intelligence. The court did not name or analyze the individual citations in the order. Outcome: Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order in CA Illinois (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants relied on four cases that the court identified as hallucinated by artificial intelligence. The court did not name or analyze the individual citations in the order. Outcome: Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order in CA Illinois (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope
Explore ILOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Illinois (2d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit7th Circuit
DateSep 16, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeReply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order
Known amount$1
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants relied on four cases that the court identified as hallucinated by artificial intelligence. The court did not name or analyze the individual citations in the order.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants cited four cases in their reply brief that were hallucinated by AI; the opinion does not identify the fabricated case names or citations individually. The court treated the citations as nonexistent authority and sanctioned the defendants by striking the reply brief.

Questions this record answers

What happened in BKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam?
Fabricated: Case Law | The defendants relied on four cases that the court identified as hallucinated by artificial intelligence. The court did not name or analyze the individual citations in the order. Outcome: Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order.
Why does BKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Reply brief stricken; Adverse Costs Order in CA Illinois (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about BKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this BKA Holdings, LLC v. Sam summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

In re Estate of Ruth M. GerdesCA Illinois (2d) · Sep 18, 2026same court · fake citations + appellateIn re Marriage of Katelyn Jill TateCA Illinois (5d) · Aug 11, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsRobert S. Hulvat v. Juli Gumina, STG Divorce Law, and Jennifer B. HulvatCA Illinois (3d) · Apr 9, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsMitchell v. HIG Realty Credit Fund, L.P.CA Georgia · Aug 19, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedIn re Marriage of Maslii v. IvanovaCA Illinois (1d) · Sep 22, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsIllinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services ex rel. Shona L. Williams v. Samuel R. Lee, IICA Illinois · Aug 31, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations