Back to case record
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
CASE BRIEF / REVIEW PACKETAV-CB-0ZYPP9SGenerated September 10, 2026Evidence checked Sep 10, 2026
TRACKED PUBLIC MATTER

Burnett v. The City of New York

SC New York · Dec 31, 2025

Jurisdiction
state
Court
SC New York
Record ID
burnett-v-the-city-of-new-york-2025-12-31
Observed outcome
Summary judgment granted for defendants; counsel ordered to show cause regarding potential sanctions.
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
ADVISOR READOUT

Why this matter warrants attention

The court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and issued an order to show cause requiring plaintiff's counsel to explain why he should not be sanctioned for citing a nonexistent case in his opposition papers.

Why the decision-maker cared

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff's counsel cited a nonexistent case (Backus v. City of Rochester, 148 AD3d 1697 [4th Dept 2017]); the court reported it was unable to locate the case and ordered counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned.

Why it matters now

One unverified cite is enough for a show-cause order — no exceptions to the cite-check rule, even for routine motions.

RECORDED ISSUES

Failure modes and consequences

  • Fake Citations
  • Tort
  • Trial
  • Ordered To Show Cause
AI attribution
Reported
Recorded tool
AI (implied, unspecified)
Known monetary consequence
Not recorded
Procedural posture
Summary judgment motion granted; order to show cause issued against plaintiff's counsel.
PRIMARY SOURCE

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open underlying source

A recorded source link is not a substitute for checking the underlying order, filing, opinion, or disciplinary record.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

What this record does—and does not—establish

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Latest evidence review: Primary Document Verified (high confidence).

PRACTICAL REVIEW IMPLICATIONS

Controls suggested by the public record

  1. Verify each cited authority, quotation, and proposition against the underlying source before filing.
  2. Retain a matter-level record of source checks and corrections.